Toronto Marlies head coach Dallas Eakins says defenceman Jake Gardiner is good enough to play with the Toronto Maple Leafs right now, but there's simply no spot for him in the lineup. - Sportsnet's Mike Johnston
Jake Gardiner and Carl Gunnarsson are both going to get healthy at some point, what should the Leafs do with their defensive logjam?
The image above is a Usage Chart generated by theninjagreg's sweet utility. You can click here in case you're reading this article not on the day it was published and the chart will be magically updated thanks to the wonders of the internet.
The way to read the chart is as follows: on the Y-Axis (up and down) is Quality of Competition. Higher up on the chart means a player faces tougher opponents. The X-Axis (left and right) is how often a player starts his shifts in the offensive zone. If a player is farther to the right it means they get shifts with less of a chance of giving up a goal.
The bubble size shows how well a player drives possession relative to their team, with blue being positive (good) and orange being negative.
We accept that Dion Phaneuf, John-Michael Liles, Jake Gardiner and Carl Gunnarsson are going to be Leafs if everyone were healthy, and we'll use Mike Komisarek as our 7th D healthy scratch to match recent results. What that means is we have two more D spots when everyone's healthy and three until Gunnar comes back, with the following players looking to stick:
- Mike Kostka
- Mark Fraser
- Korbinian Holzer
- Cody Franson
This is actually a bit of a tough decision. Looking at the usage chart Kostka, Fraser, and Franson have positive possession numbers. Holzer's major last night combined with his black hole possession numbers mean I'd eliminate him first and in the short term run D of:
Phaneuf, Kostka, Liles, Gardiner, Franson, Fraser, Komisarek
When Gunnarsson comes back we need to eliminate one of Franson, Kostka and Fraser which is where this actually gets difficult.
Pro | Con | |
KOSTKA | Highest TOI Hardest ZS | Forces Phaneuf to play the wrong side Lowest possession numbers |
FRANSON | Best Pedigree Youngest PP Work | Not ready to play on the first pair Not Shea Weber |
FRASER | Solid stats Can fight | Easiest usage of the three Identical to Franson but older |
Personally I think I'd keep Cody Franson first; his work on the power play has been excellent and he drives play well against his opponents. I think Mark Fraser is a similar player but older so I'd rather give minutes to Franson. For Fraser his fighting is a double edged sword. You generally don't want to be a d-man short for a quarter of a period or more.
Kostka had a rough start, but I'm surprised to see he's a positive possession player. I don't think I'd keep him on the first pairing, opting to go Phaneuf - Gunnarsson, Liles-Gardiner, and then Franson-Kostka but the more I think about it the more that all makes sense.
Mark Fraser's been great here so far, but I think he's the victim of a numbers game. Luckily we have the luxury of roster spots due to injury right now, and having guys like Fraser and Kostka in the organization contributing for very little money is a big help to the Leafs.
Comment Markdown
Inline Styles
Bold: **Text**
Italics: *Text*
Both: ***Text***
Strikethrough: ~~Text~~
Code: `Text` used as sarcasm font at PPP
Spoiler: !!Text!!