GMs Show Little Support for No-Touch Icing - Dan Rosen at NHL.com
I am not for no-touch icing whatsoever. Watching enough other leagues that have the no-touch, what I don't like is when the play stops. The puck is still moving but all the players stop and wait for it to go over the goal line. It's a speed game and you're supposed to play to the whistle. I just don't like that. It just aesthetically looks poor.
- Dan Malony, Phoenix Coyotes GM and moron.
The National Hockey League has an intense game that pushes speed, and you want to reward the team that is aggressively trying to get the puck back.
- Steve Tambellini, Edmonton Oilers GM and idiot.
That said, Maloney, Tambellini and many of their fellow general managers remain intrigued by the concept of hybrid icing, which is a mixture between touch and no-touch icing and gives the linesman the discretion to call icing or wave it off. Once the first player reaches the faceoff dot, the linesman will have to determine which player would reach the puck first. If it is determined to be the attacking player, the icing is waved off. If it is the defending player, icing is blown immediately. If the race to the puck produces a tie, the linesman would have to blow his whistle to call icing.
- Proposed rule change and stupid
These are my thoughts. What are yours? More links after the jump.
The Four Jerseys You've Got to Have: Maple Leafs Edition
Jon at Puckin 'Eh lays out what your closet had damn well better look like.
Phil Kessel, Better With Joffrey Lupul?
Or put another way, Phil Kessel, better without some AHL scrub on the other wing?
Oddly the answer isn't as simple as "Everybody".
Eight Maple Leafs Games to Look Forward To
Ho boy, the Canucks will be in town.
Is Jeremy Roenick America's Answer to Don Cherry?
I don't think Don Cherry ever cried that much.
NHL Moving Towards Safer Rinks
The rounded stanchion has been approved as is ready to be installed.
The National (U.S.) Schedule for All 30 Teams
The Leafs make it to the U.S. twice.
