Try as I might, more often than not my comments on Damien's blog are either lost in the fog (who can remember when Damien's moderator fell behind and then posted 35 messages with the exact same correction?) or they get 'moderated'. Well, maybe the Barilkosphere has a friend in the replay booth so to speak. From his post on the Leafs' defence:
Strangely, some have argued that since the Leafs have depth and experience in the media covering the team, they may be well-suited to intelligently cover the team.
Depth and experience? Really?
This is the same chatter we heard last fall when some suggested that the Leafs had such depth in media coverage that they were able to get an accurate portrayal of their chances.
Now we're hearing it again. Folks, it's about more than just having lots of names, bald heads, and arrogant columnists.
The Maple Leafs might have the weakest media corps in the entire league.
That makes me smile. There's another familiar face in the comments busting Cox's theories. See if you can find it. Onto the links...
- Steve looks at the tough decisions ahead for management in the forward corps.
- TSM wonders how some people get on the radio.
- When does basketball start and when do we get saved from this dumbass?
- Loonies will no longer be accepted at the ACC.
- The NHL has a beta version of it's site update up. Verdict: still MySpace-y.
- pucksandbooks has a great idea for pre-season games./
If you have any other stories toss the links in the comments.
Comment Markdown
Inline Styles
Bold: **Text**
Italics: *Text*
Both: ***Text***
Strikethrough: ~~Text~~
Code: `Text` used as sarcasm font at PPP
Spoiler: !!Text!!